Search Results for "Spot Panchnama"

1627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent in Head-On Collision with S.T. Bus. Contributory Negligence Not Established as Bus Had Crossed Bridge and Truck Fell Off, Based on Spot Panchnama and Evidence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition (No. 84 of 1995) where the claimant, Ravikant Padmakar Tarekar, was the driver of an S.T. Bus (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent in Head-On Collision with S.T. Bus. Contributory Negligence Not Established as Bus Had Crossed Bridge and Truck Fell Off, Based on Spot Panchnama and Evidence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition (No. 84 of 1995) filed by Ravikant Padmakar Tarekar, the driver of a State Transport bus, who sus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Contributory Negligence Found. Tribunal's finding of sole negligence on bus driver upheld as spot panchnama and evidence did not establish deceased's negligence.

The case arises from a motor accident on 22 July 2001 when an ST bus (MH-12/FA-1390) collided with a motorcycle, resulting in the death of Ashok Kolhe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Held Liable Despite Alleged Breach of Policy Terms. Owner Not Required to Pay Compensation Where Insurance Company Failed to Prove That Vehicle Was Carrying Hazardous Goods at Time of Accident.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the appellant, Vijay Arvind Pore, the owner of the offending truck, challenged the order of the Moto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Causing Death and Attempted Murder; Accused Pleads Right of Private Defence. Court Evaluates Discrepancies in Prosecution Evidence Regarding Place of Incident and Non-Examination of Key Witness.

The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench heard a criminal appeal challenging the conviction of the appellant under Sections 307 and 304 Part 1 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal and Remands Motor Accident Claim for Computation of Compensation, Holding That Delay in FIR Is Not Fatal and Test Is Preponderance of Probabilities. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim for Discrepancies in Vehicle Number Despite Corroborating Evidence of MLC and Spot Panchnama.

The appellant, Dilip Deshmukh, suffered grievous head injuries in a motor accident on 20 May 2011 while riding his motorcycle, when a Trax jeep collid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 2012. Appeal Challenges Conviction for Rape, Kidnapping, and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Girl Under IPC Sections 376, 366A, 506(2).

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 410 of 2010, convicting the appellant/accused no.1 und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Indian Penal Code Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Eye-Witness Testimony. Absence of Blood Stains at the Assault Site Held Not Fatal When the Victim Was Moved Immediately, and Medical Evidence Supported Ocular Account.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 2 December 1994 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, acquittin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Mamlatdar's Courts Act Orders Due to Procedural Defects and Lack of Substantive Findings. Tahsildar's Order Granting Way Access Under Section 5 Set Aside as Applications Failed to Specify Obstruction Details and Panchnamas Were Conducted Without Proper Notice.

The dispute concerned proceedings under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 regarding access to agricultural lands. The petitioners were landowners whose...