Search Results for "Sixth Central Pay Commission"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "Sixth Central Pay Commission"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Grant of Non-Functional Upgradation to Junior Engineers. Court Upholds High Court's Direction to Grant Level 9 Pay Under Seventh Central Pay Commission Recommendations, Holding That Entry-Level Distinction Cannot Deny Benefit When Four-Year Service Condition is Met.

1 Apr 2026

The dispute centered on the entitlement of Junior Engineers in the Border Road Organization to Non-Functional Upgradation to Level 9 with Grade Pay of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

22 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Dispute Over Application Date. The Court set aside the Delhi High Court's direction to apply the MACP scheme from 01-01-2006, holding that the scheme's effective date of 01-09-2008 under the office memorandum dated 19-05-2009 was valid, and employees not completing 24 years of service by that date were not entitled to benefits under the superseded ACP scheme.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the applicability date of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) introduced b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

28 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

20 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Policy on Outsourcing Class IV Posts in Aided Institutions Under Intermediate Education Act, 1921. Regulation 101, as amended, was held constitutional as a valid policy measure based on financial constraints and efficiency, under Section 9(4) of the Act, without violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

27 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging a judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Pay Parity Claim for Railway Private Secretaries Under Sixth Central Pay Commission. The Court held that paragraph 3.1.14 of the Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations, which deals with parity between field and Secretariat offices for non-Secretariat organizations, governs the claim rather than paragraph 3.1.9 which applies to Secretariat organizations.

31 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from claims by Private Secretaries (Grade-II) employed in the Eastern Central Railways (Field Office/Zonal Railways) seeking pay par...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)