Madras High Court Hears Appeal Against Partition Decree in Joint Family Property Suit. Appeal Filed Under Section 96 of CPC Seeks to Set Aside Decree Granting 1/4th Share to Plaintiff in Intestate Succession Case.
6 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Share"
5525 result(s) found
Found 5525 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Appeal Suit Challenging Partition Decree. Trial Court Ordered Partition of Suit Properties into 25 Equal Shares with 19/25 Share to Plaintiffs.
17 Jul 2026The appeal arises from the decree of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu, in O.S.No.243 of 2005, whereby the trial court ordered partition of ...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Second Appeal Challenging Partition Decree – Defendant No. 2 Contests Allocation of 1/4th Share in Suit Property
8 Apr 2025The second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (defen...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Second Appeal Filed by Purchasers in Partition Suit — Sale Deeds Executed by Karta Without Legal Necessity Not Binding on Coparceners. Alienation of Five Parcels When Only One Was Sufficient to Raise Required Funds Fails the Prudent Owner Test and Is Not for the Benefit of the Estate Under Hindu Law.
9 Apr 2010The dispute arose from a suit for partition filed by a minor son and his mother against the father, who was the Karta of a joint Hindu family. The pla...
High Court
Bombay High Court Sanctions Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Organon (India) Limited — Scheme Approved Despite Objection Regarding Valuation and Fairness. Court held that the reduction was fair and reasonable, and the objection regarding valuation was not sustainable as the price was based on SEBI delisting guidelines and accepted by majority shareholders.
7 Jun 2010The judgment concerns a Company Scheme Petition filed by Organon (India) Limited seeking sanction and confirmation of a special resolution passed by i...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer and Gift Validity. Statutory Register Prevails Over Returns Filed with Registrar of Companies in Case of Conflict.
10 Mar 2005The present appeal is filed under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956, challenging the order and judgment passed by the Company Law Board. The app...
- 87
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Upholds Inclusion of Share Premium in Paid-Up Capital for Super-Tax Rebate under Finance Acts. Share Premium Account Maintained as Identifiable Separate Account within Reserves Qualifies for Inclusion under Explanation to Paragraph D of Part II of Finance Acts 1956 and 1957, Not Barred by Companies Act 1956.
14 Feb 1969The Allahabad Bank Ltd., a public limited company with paid-up share capital of Rs. 30,50,000, had issued shares at a premium before January 1, 1954, ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.
9 May 2014Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Son's Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Daughter's Enhanced Share Under Muslim Law. Son's claim for half share rejected; daughter granted 2/9th share as daughter and 1/3rd share as widow of predeceased son under Muslim Personal Law.
30 Jun 2014The plaintiff, Mohammed Ashraf, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of an immovable property bearing CTS No. 340 in Belgaum, claiming t...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Case — Daughter Entitled to Equal Share in Ancestral Property. Court holds that a married daughter is a coparcener under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and notional partition cannot defeat her rights.
28 Mar 2014The case involves a dispute over ancestral properties between a sister (respondent/plaintiff) and her brother's family (appellants/defendants). The re...
- 115
