Search Results for "Section 6(3)(b)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 6(3)(b)"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Copyright Infringement Prosecution — Registration of Copyright Not Mandatory for Criminal Action Under Copyright Act, 1957. Court holds that prior registration under Section 44 is not a prerequisite for launching prosecution under Sections 63, 63B, and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

22 Oct 2024

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dattatray Bapu Dighe challenging the framing of charges against him for alleged copyright i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice Under FEMA for Alleged Violation of Section 6(3)(b) and Regulation 3(1) of Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000. Court held that the show cause notice was issued beyond the limitation period of 16 years under Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA and that the acquisition of shares of a foreign company by a resident Indian company does not require prior approval under the regulations.

14 Jul 2022

The petitioners, Sterlite Industries (India) Limited and its directors, filed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated 19th February 2009...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Copyright Infringement Case Due to Lack of Authorization. The court held that the complaint under Sections 63B and 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957, was not filed by a person authorized by the copyright owner, rendering the FIR an abuse of process.

9 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Anand Palan and Sheetal Palan, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.

29 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Marriage and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and presence of accused at scene.

4 Jul 2016

The appellant, Pramod Navneet Shirsat, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Akola, for the murder of Pratibha under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Co...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)