Search Results for "Section 52A MRTP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Section 52A MRTP Act"

3 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

1 Nov 2018

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for Deemed Lapse of Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Within Twelve Months of Notice Under Section 127 Results in Reservation Lapsing and Land Becoming Available for Development. The court held that the mere passing of a resolution or delegation of powers does not constitute taking steps for acquisition; actual steps such as issuance of notification under Section 126(4) are required.

30 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Mohammed Shaffi Usmansaheb Kokani and others, owned land in Nashik that was reserved for a garden under Reservation No.358C in the De...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)