Search Results for "Section 511 IPC"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet, with recovery of weapons under Arms Act, 1959.

The case pertains to the murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet on 31.10.2001. The deceased was last seen with the appellants Shabbir and Ravi Mandal (along with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application and Discharges Accused in Abetment of Suicide Attempt Case. Allegations of Debt Recovery Harassment Do Not Constitute Abetment Under Section 306 IPC Read with Section 511 IPC.

The applicant, A.R. Satish, was arraigned as an accused in Criminal Revision Application No.435 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court. He was charged w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 420/511 IPC Charges in Money Lending Case Due to Absence of Deception. Default in Loan Repayment Does Not Constitute Cheating Under IPC When Initial Intention to Repay Existed.

The petitioner, Ramesh Babulal Chaudhari, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashing of FIR No. 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempted Murder and Burglary Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 457, 380, 511 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Muka Biren Rathod, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 307, 457, 380, and 511 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Results in Reduced Sentence for Attempt to Rape and Sexual Assault. Court modifies conviction, reducing rigorous imprisonment from 10 years to 5 years, following a re-evaluation of evidence and legal precedents.

The accused challenges the judgment by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, which sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution evidence was contradictory and unreliable.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Ramesh Durgappa Hirekerur, Rohit Ira Mudgal, and Mahesh @ Mendis Govindappa Bovi against their convi...