Search Results for "Section 5(21)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Section 5(21)"

183 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Eviction Petition Under Section 120(c) of Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Tenancy Rights Extinguish on Death of Last Tenant. Successors Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 120(c) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 as They Were Not Personally Cultivating the Land.

23 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Vidarbha Maharogi Seva Mandal, a public trust registered in 1961-1962, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.83 and Gat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Eviction Petition Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Legal Heirs Not Entitled to Protection After Death of Original Tenant. The court held that Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, does not protect legal heirs of a deceased tenant, and the eviction order was restored.

23 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Vidarbha Maharogi Seva Mandal, a public trust, filed an application under Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural L...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

20 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Plea of Former Finance Minister in INX Media Money Laundering Case. Custodial Interrogation Required Under PMLA as Allegations of FIPB Clearance Irregularities and Receipt of Proceeds of Crime Are Serious.

5 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by P. Chidambaram, former Finance Minister, against the Delhi High Court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Asset Managers in Commercial Paper Recovery Suit Despite Pending SICA Appeal. The court held that Section 22 of SICA does not bar recovery suits where BIFR has declined registration, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issue.

5 Feb 2016

The plaintiffs, Pramerica Asset Managers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed two summary suits against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 25 c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

27 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Barge Sale Agreement. Jurisdictional Objection Must Be Decided Before Granting or Refusing Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2016

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)