Search Results for "Section 450"

401 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 401 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in Village Political Rivalry Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and motive.

The appellant, Chandansing s/o Dhannasing Patre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the offence punishable under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Evidence of Cruelty or Abetment of Suicide. Presumption under Section 113A of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 not applicable as suicide occurred beyond seven years of marriage.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four respondents (husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law of the deceased...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Agreement Not a Bar to Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Payment under agreement does not extinguish right to seek higher compensation if agreement was not voluntary or was under coercion.

The appellant, Syed Miya s/o Syed Buran, filed two appeals challenging the judgment and award dated 20.8.1993 passed by the Reference Court, which rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances and recovery of weapon was doubtful.

The appellant, Arjun Puna Soni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Nagendra Singh, a carpenter, and sentenced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...