Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Evidence of Cruelty or Abetment of Suicide. Presumption under Section 113A of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 not applicable as suicide occurred beyond seven years of marriage.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 113
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four respondents (husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law of the deceased) for offences under Sections 498A (cruelty) and 306 (abetment of suicide) of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased, Swati, died by suicide on 23 September 1995. The prosecution alleged that the respondents subjected her to cruelty and abetted her suicide. The trial court acquitted all accused. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no perversity in the acquittal. The court noted that the marriage took place in 1985, more than seven years before the suicide, so the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act did not apply. The evidence of the complainant (father of the deceased) and other witnesses was found to be inconsistent and lacking in credibility. There was no independent witness to support the allegations of cruelty or dowry demand. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the ingredients of Sections 498A and 306 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed and the acquittal was confirmed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Sections 498A, 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Acquittal upheld - The State appealed against acquittal of husband and in-laws for alleged cruelty and abetment of suicide of deceased Swati. The court found no evidence of cruelty or abetment, and the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was not applicable as the suicide occurred more than seven years after marriage. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-24)

B) Evidence Act - Presumption as to abetment of suicide - Section 113A Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Not applicable - The deceased committed suicide on 23-9-1995, and the marriage was in 1985, i.e., more than seven years prior. Therefore, the presumption under Section 113A could not be invoked. (Paras 2-3)

C) Criminal Law - Cruelty - Section 498A Indian Penal Code, 1860 - No evidence - The prosecution failed to prove any wilful conduct likely to drive the woman to suicide or harassment for unlawful demand. The allegations were vague and unsupported by independent witnesses. (Paras 4-24)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquittal of the respondents for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code was perverse and liable to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Acquittal of respondents confirmed.

Law Points

  • Presumption under Section 113A Indian Evidence Act not applicable beyond seven years of marriage
  • Acquittal upheld for lack of evidence of cruelty under Section 498A IPC and abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-AS:32596

Criminal Appeal No. 450 of 1997

2019-11-13

K.R. Shriram, J.

2019:BHC-AS:32596

Ms Anamika Malhotra APP for State/Appellant, Mr. Rushikesh Kale a/w Ms Chandni Sachade i/b Mr. V. V. Purwant for Respondents

The State of Maharashtra

Anil Kurkotti, Virbhadrappa Sidramappa Kurkoti, Kamlabai Virbhadrappa Kurkoti, Ajitkumar Virbhadrappa Kurkoti

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal

Remedy Sought

State sought conviction of respondents for offences under Sections 498A and 306 IPC

Filing Reason

State aggrieved by acquittal of respondents by trial court

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted all four accused on 21-3-1997

Issues

Whether the acquittal of the respondents for offences under Sections 498A and 306 IPC was perverse? Whether the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act could be invoked?

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that the trial court erred in acquitting the respondents despite evidence of cruelty and abetment of suicide. Respondents argued that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and the appeal should be dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act is not applicable when suicide occurs beyond seven years of marriage. The prosecution failed to prove cruelty or abetment of suicide beyond reasonable doubt. The trial court's acquittal was not perverse.

Judgment Excerpts

Appellant has approached this court impugning a judgment delivered on 21-3-1997, whereby four accused were acquitted against a charge of offence punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Therefore, the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, cannot apply.

Procedural History

Trial court acquitted respondents on 21-3-1997. State filed Criminal Appeal No. 450 of 1997 in the High Court of Bombay. High Court dismissed the appeal on 13-11-2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 306
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 113A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case for Percolation Tank. Market value enhanced to Rs. 1,00,000 per acre with 30% development deduction and statutory benefits under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Evidence of Cruelty or Abetment of Suicide. Presumption under Section 113A of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 not applicable as suicide occurred beyond seven years of mar...