Search Results for "Section 446 Companies Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Section 446 Companies Act"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Application for Possession of Tenanted Premises from Official Liquidator in Company Liquidation — Tenancy Rights Not Assets Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956. Monthly tenancy rights do not constitute assets of the company in liquidation; the Company Court can direct handover of possession where the Official Liquidator's need is not genuine.

12 Mar 2025

The applicants, as landlords of Flat Nos. 4 and 5 in Jaitirath Mansion, Barrack Road, Mumbai, filed an application under Section 446 of the Companies ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of MIDC Plot to Auction Purchaser in Winding Up Proceedings — Official Liquidator's Sale Confirmed Despite MIDC's Objection. Court holds that MIDC cannot refuse transfer of property sold by Official Liquidator in company winding up, as the sale is conducted under court supervision and the purchaser steps into the shoes of the company.

21 Aug 2020

The applicant, M/s. Metal Tubes and Rolling Mills, filed a Company Application seeking directions against the Regional Officer, MIDC (Respondent No.2)...

High Court

High Court Permits Official Liquidator to Break Open Lock and Take Physical Possession of Company Premises Despite Collusive Tenancy Decrees Obtained After Winding Up Without Leave Under Section 446 Companies Act, 1956. The court held that decrees obtained without leave under Section 446 are void and the Official Liquidator is entitled to possession.

30 Aug 2019

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking permission to break open the lock put by the ex-management of J.B. Diamonds Limited (in liquidation) an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Winding Up Petition Despite DRT Decree — Recovery of Debts Act Does Not Bar Winding Up Proceedings Under Companies Act. Secured Creditor Need Not Relinquish Security Before Admission of Winding Up Petition; Election Arises Only After Winding Up Order Under Section 529 Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2019

The case involves the right of a secured creditor, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., to file a winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956, after having...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Resolution Professional to Continue CIRP Under IBC Despite Pending Winding-Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956. Leave under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 granted to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

2 Nov 2018

The judgment concerns Company Application No. 10 of 2017 filed by the Resolution Professional of Murli Industries Limited (the corporate debtor) under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

26 Jul 2018

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Criminal Complaints Under Section 138 NI Act Not Covered by Company Law Moratorium. The expression 'suit or other proceedings' in Sections 442 and 446(1) of Companies Act, 1956 does not include criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

6 May 2016

The case involves a reference to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge judgments of the Bombay High Court regarding whether criminal complaints ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Inspection of Court Records Against Company in Liquidation. Official Liquidator Directed to Provide Access to Suit Papers for Recovery of Salary and Benefits Under Order XI Rule 14 CPC and Section 434 Companies Act, 1956.

7 Jun 2005

The plaintiff, Omprakash Madanlal Pandya, filed a suit (Suit No.1738 of 1979) against Shree Vallabh Glass Works Ltd. and others for recovery of Rs.1,5...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)