Search Results for "Section 366"

657 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 657 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute, Quashing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, as Held by Constitution Bench Overruling Prior Precedent.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Government of NCT of Delhi against judgments of the High Court of Delhi that declared land acquisition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves five criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, dated 27-6-2013 in Sessions Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Election Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, a Non-Member of the Federation and Its Member Societies, Cannot Challenge Election of Directors Under Goa Cooperative Societies Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Madhav Atmaram Sahakari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...