Search Results for "Section 35G"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Section 35G"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

16 Dec 2010

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ceiling Act Revision Order — Landlord's Surplus Land Declaration Confirmed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Valid Despite Lack of Notice to Landlord.

2 Aug 2005

The appellant, Vilas Ratanchand Shah, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 31st August 1998 in Writ Petition No.2475 of 1980, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal as Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Appeal Relating to Rate of Duty and Value of Goods Lies Only to Supreme Court.

11 Jul 2017

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Kolhapur filed an appeal under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

30 Sep 2024

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Leasing of Wagons to Railways. Leasing of Wagons to Railways Constitutes 'Supply of Tangible Goods Services' Under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994.

18 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of CGST, ST & Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order dated 05/04/201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions of Contractual Employees Seeking Regularisation in Electricity Supply Company. Petitioners failed to establish any legal right to regularisation as they were engaged on contract basis without following due process of recruitment.

7 Mar 2019

The petitioners, numbering 47 individuals, were engaged as Operators and Helpers on a contractual basis by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporatio...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)