Search Results for "Section 33(8)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Section 33(8)"

501 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 501 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Fresh Arbitration After Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Without Deciding Merits — Observations in Setting Aside Award Do Not Constitute Res Judicata. The Court held that setting aside an arbitral award under Sections 34/37 does not adjudicate the merits, and parties are free to arbitrate afresh under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2025

The applicant, Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd., had entered into a contract with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) for construction ...

High Court

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

10 Jan 2025

The case arises from a road accident on 30.10.2016 at about 2.15 p.m. on Mohanur to Karur Road near Vangal Bridge. The defacto complainant Jagadeeswar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Granting Pardon to Approver Under Section 306 Cr.P.C. — Failure to Record Satisfaction That Accused Voluntarily Confesses and Makes Full Disclosure. The court held that the order granting pardon to accused No.4 was unsustainable as the trial court did not record its satisfaction regarding voluntary confession and full disclosure of facts.

16 Jun 2023

The petitioners, accused Nos. 5 and 6 in Special C.C. No. 54/2014 pending before the LXXXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision in Rent Suit — No Willful Default or Bona Fide Need Established. Landlord failed to prove willful default in payment of rent and bona fide need for personal use under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

2 Feb 2022

The applicant, Surgonda Kalgonda Patil, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit for possession of suit premises and recovery of arrears of rent ag...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SC/ST Commission Order in Service Dispute — Commission Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Promotion and Seniority. Held that the Commission under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 cannot adjudicate service matters or direct promotions.

23 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Sri M.B. Siddalingaswamy, a Scheduled Caste employee working as Superintendent in the Department of Pre-University Education, Karnatak...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Land Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession, but Court Grants Relief Based on Revenue Records and Admission by Defendants. The court held that when the defendant admits the plaintiff's title and possession in the written statement, the burden of proof is discharged and the suit must be decreed.

28 Aug 2019

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the trial court, filed Special Civil Suit No. 54 of 2012 seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Charges Against Hotel Managing Director and General Manager in Guest Fall Case — No Criminal Negligence Established. Vicarious Liability Not Attracted Under Sections 336/338 IPC and Section 4 COTPA Without Specific Allegations of Active Role.

21 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Shiv Kumar Jatia (accused No.2, Managing Director) and Aseem Kapoor (accused No.4, General Manager) aga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Criminal Intent. Complaint under Section 338 IPC fails as essential ingredients of grievous hurt by rash or negligent act not established without expert evidence.

20 Aug 2019

The petitioner, a practicing ophthalmologist, challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, which upheld the Magistrate's order issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compounding of Section 279 IPC Offence Where Accused is Sole Injured Person. The court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the offence under Section 279 IPC is compoundable when the accused is the only injured person, applying the principle of mutatis mutandis from Section 338 IPC.

20 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Vishal Agarwal, was driving a Zen car on 7 January 2010 at Agacaim, Goa. Due to his rash driving, he dashed a mini bus on its front si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Failure to Serve Grounds — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Denied as Grounds Not Communicated Under Section 3(1)(2) of Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.

29 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Dinesh s/o Ramchandra Tiwari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 5th April 2011 passed ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)