Search Results for "Section 32K"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Purchase Declared Ineffective Due to Tenant's Default in Payment of Instalments. MRT's Condonation of Delay Without Proper Opportunity to Oppose Set Aside.

The case involves agricultural lands owned by the petitioners (landlords) which were let out to the deceased respondent no.1 (tenant). The tenant was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Dispute Over Delayed Payment of Purchase Price. Belated payment with interest and penalty before landlord's application does not render sale ineffective under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Baburao Pandurang Madane and Vithal Pandurang Madane, were tenants of agricultural land survey No. 39/1 at village Kusmod, Taluka Mal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Company in INR 8 Crore Duty Evasion Case Due to Immunity Under Settlement Commission. Appellant-Company exempted from prosecution as per immunity granted by the Settlement Commission, Gujarat High Court's order overturned.

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the Appellant-Company, accused of evading countervailing duty (CVD) to the tune of INR 8 crores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to MRT Order on Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings. Earlier Dismissal for Default Does Not Bar Subsequent Proceedings Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ashish Chandrasingh Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 2nd November, 2018 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Apportionment Dispute. Co-owners entitled to equal share in compensation absent proof of exclusive possession or title.

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the Government acquired land admeasuring 1 Acre 26 Gunthas and 8 Annas from Survey No. 26/9 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals, Enhances Compensation for Dharuhera Village Acquisition. Land Losers Entitled to Rs. 1,49,14,975/- per Acre Based on Exemplary Sale Deeds Under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of twenty-seven appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings in Haryana. Sixteen appeals pertained to acqui...