Search Results for "Section 32F notice"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Tenancy Dispute Involving Widow Tenant's Deemed Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Tenant's Failure to Exercise Option Under Section 32F After Widow's Death Precludes Automatic Purchase.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands at Wai under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. On the tillor's day (1.4.1957), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Termination of Agricultural Tenancy for Bona Fide Personal Cultivation. Landlord's Successor in Interest Entitled to Resume Possession Under Section 31 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural land, challenged the judgment and order dated 30 December 1988 of the Tenancy Awal Karkun, Shirala, and the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Remand by Revenue Tribunal Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Concurrent Findings of Lower Authorities. Widow's Right to Terminate Tenancy Under Section 31 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Upheld.

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the original landlady Smt. Bakulabai Rama Naikwadi, challenged the order dated 20th March 1991 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Tenant’s Right to Purchase Tenanted Land Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 – Whether Barred by Res Judicata and Failure to Issue Intimation Within Statutory Period?

Landlord’s Obligation to Intimate Tenant of Attaining Majority – Retrospective Application of 1969 Amendment – Tenant’s Right to Purchase Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...