Search Results for "Section 29"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Housing Board in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Compliance with Notice Requirements. Failure to Include Khasra Number in Public Notice and Serve Individual Notice Under Sections 28 and 29 of U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 Vitiates Acquisition.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (Board) against the Allahabad High Court's judgment quashing the acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 8, 10, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Pravin Narayan Khole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Special (Child) Case No.9/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Under Section 26 of Domestic Violence Act in Divorce Proceedings. Application Under Section 26 of DV Act Held Maintainable in Civil Suit for Divorce, and Appeal Under Section 29 Lies to Sessions Court Against Order of Civil Court.

The petitioner, Shri Narayan Babi Salgaonkar, a police constable, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Restoration of Essential Services Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Procedural Defect in Filing Section 29 Application Within Rent Suit Cured by Appellate Court's Merits Decision.

The petitioner, Namdeo Maruti Mane, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Ad-hoc District Judge-1, Bhoom in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 19/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summoning of Insurance Company Employees for Election Duties. Government Company Not a Local Authority Under Section 29 of Representation of the People Act, 1950.

The petitioner, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, a Government company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by State Financial Corporation Against Injunction Restraining Possession Under Section 29 of SFC Act. Statutory Right to Take Possession Cannot Be Injuncted Without Proof of Arbitrariness.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21st January 2002 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Nasik, allowing the application fo...