Search Results for "Section 281B"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 281B"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand of Entire Tax Within One Week and Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Stay, Directs Continuation of Provisional Attachment. Proviso to Section 220(1) of Income Tax Act Could Not Be Invoked as Provisional Attachment Under Section 281B Already Adequately Protected Revenue.

26 Mar 2012

The petitioner, an assessee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment and Stay Rejection in Income Tax Case — Violation of Natural Justice and CBDT Circular. Petitioner's Bank Accounts Attached Without Prior Hearing; Court Directs Restoration of Status Quo Pending Appeal.

26 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Milestone Real Estate Fund, a real estate fund, challenged the provisional attachment of its assets under Section 281B of the Income T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Lift Attachment of Mortgaged Properties in Favor of State Financial Corporation Over Income Tax Recovery. Priority of secured creditor under Section 46A of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 prevails over Crown debt for income tax arrears.

13 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Karnataka State Industrial Investment Development Corporation Ltd., a State owned Corporation and a Financial Institution governed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment and Orders Stay of Recovery in Income Tax Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with CBDT Circular. The Assessing Officer's failure to record reasons and provide hearing under Section 281B, and ignoring CBDT Circular on stay of demand, led to setting aside of attachment and recovery proceedings.

26 Mar 2019

The Petitioner, Milestone Real Estate Fund, a trust, challenged the provisional attachment order dated 18.12.2018 under Section 281B of the Income Tax...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

2 Apr 2024

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Attachment Order Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act — Creditor Can Execute Recovery Certificate Against Any Available Property Despite Prior SARFAESI Proceedings. The court held that there is no legal bar to a creditor simultaneously proceeding under the SARFAESI Act and executing a recovery certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 against other properties of the debtor.

25 Mar 2019

The petitioners, M/s Anjali Tours & Travels and Others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an attachment order issued by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

20 Feb 2015

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

8 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)