Search Results for "Section 278B"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Clarification in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 — Circular No.21/2020 Held Ultra Vires. The clarification requiring withdrawal of appeal as a condition for filing declaration under the Act was struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a public limited company engaged in real estate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Prosecution Due to Non-Recovery of Tax Demand. Death of Principal Accused and Dissolution of Firm Render Prosecution Under Sections 276C and 277 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The applicants filed two criminal applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking quashing of RCC No.194/2004 and RCC No....