Search Results for "Section 25FFF"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Closure of Shipping Company Office. Labour Court's Finding of Genuine Closure Upheld; No Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 1(b) and 1(d) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Lionel Edward & India Steamship Employees Union challenging the dismissal of their complaint of unfair labo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Retrenched Workers Seeking Reinstatement and Continuity of Service. Workers of a closed textile mill not entitled to reinstatement as closure was genuine and compensation under Section 25FFF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was paid.

The petitioners, 42 workers of Kalmeshwar Textile Mills, challenged their retrenchment following the closure of the mill. The mill was closed due to f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Casual Worker in BSNL Case — 50% Back Wages Upheld. Continuous Service of 371 Days Over 13 Months Constitutes Regular Employment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), challenged an award dated 12.11.2003 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement to Employee of Closed Family Welfare Centre. Termination Due to Closure of Establishment Not a Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Pradip Patil, was employed as a peon and later as a clerk/storekeeper at the Family Welfare Centre run by Yugantar Education Society i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Co-operative Society Election. Court upholds election process conducted by Returning Officer under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Kiran Shankar Prasad Pande, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the election of the manag...