Search Results for "Section 240(4)"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashed Criminal Proceedings Against the Appellants Due to Settlement, Despite Section 307 IPC Charges.

Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Quashing of Criminal Proceedings – Distinction Between Compounding and Quashment – Role of Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Order XLI Rule 33 CPC. Appellate Court Exceeded Powers by Setting Aside Final Decree in Unconnected Suit Without Appeal or Cross-Objection.

The appellant, Smt. Shantawwa, filed a Miscellaneous Second Appeal under Section 43 Rule 1(u) read with Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Sales Tax on Pan Masala and Gutkha in Multiple Appeals. State Legislatures Empowered to Levy Sales Tax on These Goods Despite Central Excise Levies, as They Are Not Declared Goods Under Section 14(ix) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from judgments of three High Courts concerning the taxability of pan masala and gutkha under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Development Permission Despite Pending Criminal Case Against Different Property Developer. The court held that a criminal case concerning a different property cannot be a valid ground to refuse development permission for a separate land under a valid development agreement.

The petitioners, M/s. Gurudaya Builders, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) to grant develo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESI Corporation's Appeal in Coverage Dispute. Employer's Application Under Section 75 of ESI Act Allowed as Corporation Failed to Prove Employment of 10 or More Persons.

The case involves an appeal by the Regional Director and Recovery Officer of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (appellants) against the judgm...