Search Results for "Section 202 CrPC inquiry"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court upheld the summoning of additional accused post-trial conclusion, emphasizing the High Court’s revisional powers and the necessity of fresh trials to ensure justice.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Summoning of Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion Held Valid — Reiteration of Revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in PMLA Default Bail Case — BNSS Proviso Not Retrospective. Complaint Filed Before BNSS Commencement Governed by Old Law; No Default Bail as Complaint Filed Within 60 Days of Arrest.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court's order rejecting default bail to the appellant, Parvinder Singh, in a money ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Issued as Security — Endorsement on Cheque and Plaint Admission Confirm Security Purpose, No Legally Enforceable Debt Exists

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Directors and Managing Director of R.L. Steels & Energy Limited, quashing the criminal complaint un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Relatives in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Omnibus Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and DV Act complaint quashed for lack of specific overt acts against appellants.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by Appellants, quashing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord between (complainant) and her husband ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Without Section 202 CrPC Inquiry in Complaint Case Against Accused Residing Outside Jurisdiction. Non-compliance with mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC renders issuance of process illegal and matter remanded for fresh inquiry.

The petitioners, who are the wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law of the complainant (respondent No. 2), challenged the order of the...