Search Results for "Section 142 Customs Act"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand for Goods Imported at Different Port. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay lacks jurisdiction to demand duty for goods imported at New Delhi under an advance licence after change of port of registration.

The petitioner, Vimal Nath, carrying on business as M/s Sharika Intl, was issued an advance licence on 16/2/1994 by licensing authorities at Delhi per...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand Against Ex-Director for Company Dues — No Personal Liability Without Statutory Provision. Section 142(1)(c)(ii) of Customs Act, 1962 does not authorise recovery from a former director who ceased to be associated with the company before the demand.

The petitioner, Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old senior citizen, was formerly a director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later renamed PDG Infotech Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Importing Customs Recovery Provisions for Excise Duty Interest. Section 12 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Validly Empowers Application of Customs Act Recovery Mechanisms for Interest on Delayed Payment of Excise Duty.

The petitioner, Krishnakant Sakharam Ghag, a partner of M/s Amit Textile Processors, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...