Search Results for "Section 129A Customs Act"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Commissioner of Customs Can Disagree with Inquiry Officer's Report Under CHA Licensing Regulations, 2004 — Full Bench resolves conflict on scope of disciplinary authority's power to differ from subordinate officer's findings.

The petitioner, M/s. Delta Logistics, a partnership firm, was a licensed Customs House Agent (CHA) under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses FCI's Appeal in Customs Duty Refund Case — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 128 Cannot Be Condoned. Import of Section 129A to condone delay in first appeal under Section 128 is impermissible as Customs Act is a complete code.

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 104 of CPC, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal in Rig Import Valuation Case — Upholds Reassessment Based on Higher Transaction Value. Customs Duty Demand on 'Pride Pennsylvania' Rig Upheld as Invoice Value Not Sole Determinant Under Customs Act, 1962.

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Hearing Opportunity Was Denied.

The petitioners, partners of M/s Bright International, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Appeal Filed.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Haresh Nagindas Vora and Sachin Laxmichand Shah, partners of M/s Bright International, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Reference Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 for reference of questions of law from CEGAT order held time-barred as delay of 240 days not explained.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an application under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking a reference to the High Court of certain ...