Search Results for "Section 114 Evidence Act"

2051 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2051 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Preliminary Decree Set Aside. Registered Will Fails to Meet Attestation Requirements Under Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case concerns a dispute over a tenement originally allotted to Suhagwanti Devi, the wife of late Harbans Lal, under a redevelopment scheme. After ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Dacoity and Murder in Nagpur Bench. Conviction under Section 396 read with Section 397 IPC confirmed based on identification evidence and recovery of stolen property.

The appellant, Sanjay @ Papdya @ Pawan @ Prashant @ Rahul Kale @ Pawar Bhosale @ Chavhan, was convicted by the Extra Joint (Ad hoc) Additional Session...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 394, 449 IPC Set Aside as Chain of Circumstances Incomplete.

The appellant, Ananda Genu Rajapure, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. 220 of 1990 for the murder of Cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement of Sale Proved by Preponderance of Probabilities; Defendant Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 114 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appellant, Marigouda Chanabasappa Marigoudar, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance of contract filed by the respondents (plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Accused in Dacoity Case, Converts Conviction to Section 411 IPC Based on Insufficient Presumption. Recovery of Stolen Cloth from Cloth Merchant Not Sufficient to Infer Participation in Dacoity Under Illustration (a) of Section 114 Evidence Act, 1872.

The case arose from a dacoity in which cloth, ornaments, and cash were stolen from a shop. The appellant, Sheo Nath, was a cloth merchant whose house ...