Search Results for "Section 111 Customs Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 111 Customs Act"

162 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Disposal of Seized Gold Jewellery Without Notice and Before Confiscation Order. Customs Authorities Directed to Pay Current Market Value for 1028 Grams of Gold Disposed in Violation of Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962 and Article 300A of Constitution.

21 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Leyla Mohmoodi and Mojtaba Ebrahim Gholami, through their constituted attorney, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prohibition Order Against Customs Broker in Licensing Dispute — Regulation 23 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 Cannot Be Invoked Without Prior Suspension or Revocation Proceedings. The court held that Regulation 23 is a residuary power for urgent preventive action and cannot be used to bypass the specific procedures for suspension and revocation under Regulations 17 and 20.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Cargomar, a customs broker governed by the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, filed a writ pe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeals in Gold Smuggling Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Violations. Confiscation of Gold and Imposition of Penalties Set Aside for Failure to Prove Smuggling Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

11 Oct 2017

The case involves five appeals filed by Ciabro Alemao (through legal representatives), Joaquim Alemao, Churchill Alemao, Anthony John Rodrigues, and S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Jan 2014

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)