Search Results for "SICA repeal"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Maharashtra Act Moratorium Does Not Bar Insolvency Proceedings as Section 238 of the Code Overrides Inconsistent State Laws.

The appeal arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor, a multi-product compan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Erstwhile Directors in First Insolvency Case, Holding IBC Overrides State Moratorium. Corporate Debtor's Belated Defence of Non-Disbursal Under Master Restructuring Agreement Rejected as After-Thought.

The case arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, a multi-product company, faced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...