Search Results for "SEBI Guidelines"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Liquidate Sai Group of Companies' Assets to Refund Investors Comprehensive Mandate Issued for Asset Auction and Investor Refund Process

The petitioners, a family of three, have invoked the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, seeking several di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Authority for Advance Ruling's Refusal to Give Ruling on Tax Liability of Capital Gains from Sale of Shares by Mauritius-Based Company. Authority's Order Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction Since Proviso to Section 245R(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Attracted.

The petitioner, Mahindra BT Investment Co. (Mauritius) Ltd., a company incorporated in Mauritius and a tax resident there, filed an application for ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute Due to Limitation. Claim Filed Beyond Six-Month Period Under BSE Regulation 252(2) Is Barred.

The petitioner, Kalpana Munish Bumb, was a constituent of respondent no. 1, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The last transaction betwee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.

The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...