Search Results for "SARFAESI Act, 2002"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "SARFAESI Act, 2002"

415 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Authority to Auction Defaulting Employer's Property Despite Bank's Secured Interest Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of EPF Dues Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11(2) of EPF Act Upheld.

17 Dec 2025

The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund (Petitioner) filed a writ petition seeking auction of the property of Respondent No.2 (the emp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

26 Jul 2024

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser.

20 Dec 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribuna...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Trial Court Order on Memo and Injunction Application in Pending Partition Suit. Plaintiff Challenges Order Allowing Bank's Memo and Rejecting Interim Relief Under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

24 Aug 2023

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.

24 Aug 2016

The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether DRT Mumbai Has Territorial Jurisdiction Under SARFAESI Act When Cause of Action Arises in Mumbai and Secured Property in Gujarat. Interpretation of Sections 17(7) SARFAESI Act and 19(1) RDDB Act and Applicability of CPC Section 16 to Securitization Applications.

15 Dec 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 8 October 20...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)