Search Results for "Rule 36(1) non-compliance"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...