Search Results for "Rule 22"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Breach of Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 and Contradictory Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by the original accused, Ibrahimbhai Kalabhai, challenging his conviction under the Prevent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Division and Sealing of Samples Leads to Upholding of Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused for offences under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Regularisation of Daily Wage Employee. Appointment Was on Daily Wage Basis, Not Regular Selection Under Rule 22 of Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules 1985.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had directed regularis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Bank Employee Who Took VRS — Rule 22 of SBI Pension Fund Rules Interpreted Liberally. Court held that the petitioner, who completed 20 years of pensionable service before voluntary retirement, is entitled to pension under Rule 22(1)(c) irrespective of age.

The petitioner, Rugmini Ganesh, was appointed as a clerk in the State Bank of India on 01/09/1980 on probation and was confirmed on 01/03/1981. She to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 by Not Adding Preservative to Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector Suresh Vithal Joshi, appealed against the judgment and order dated 3rd April 2001 passed by the Chief...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Sampling from Bulk Container Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused Suryabhan Ukarda Rokade for offences under the Prevention of Food Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 for Mixing and Dividing Sample Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Girishkumar A. Dedhia, by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Division of Sample Leads to Upholding of Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents-accused by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Criminal Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Dividing Sample Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector M.M. Acharya, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 11/8/1992 passed by the Judicial M...