Search Results for "Rule 209"

440 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Oil Corporation in Octroi Abolition Case. Octroi Demands and Seizure of Depots Quashed as Municipal Council Lacked Authority After 1999 Amendment to Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Co-owner in possession cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners without clear ouster; suit for partition not barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The present regular second appeal arises out of a partition suit originally filed as O.S. No. 9/1993 on the file of the Munsiff & JMFC, Koratagere. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld for Workmen Found to Have Completed 240 Days of Service and Terminated Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Duncan Engineering Ltd. (erstwhile Schrader Duncan Ltd.) challenging separate awards passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Shifting of Liquor Shop Between Regions in Union Territory of Puducherry. The term 'place' in Rule 209 of the Puducherry Excise Rules, 1970 is not restricted to a particular region but permits shifting within the entire Union Territory.

The appellant, M/s Cee Cee & Cee Cee's, held an F.L. 1 License under the Puducherry Excise Act, 1970 for wholesale vending of Indian Made Foreign Liqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Child Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC. Seven-Year-Old Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Dilip Bharat Gavand @ Kanwa, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(f) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Termination of Agricultural Tenancy for Bona Fide Personal Cultivation. Landlord's Successor in Interest Entitled to Resume Possession Under Section 31 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural land, challenged the judgment and order dated 30 December 1988 of the Tenancy Awal Karkun, Shirala, and the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Occupier's Challenge to Deposit Condition in Property Tax Appeal. Section 217(5) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Allows Appellate Court to Impose Deposit Condition Despite Section 209(3) Limitation on Occupier's Liability.

The petitioners, Dena Bank and its manager, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26 March 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition of POTA Detenus Seeking Release on Ground of Unlawful Detention. Court holds that detention under POTA is valid and habeas corpus cannot be used to challenge conditions of detention or seek bail.

The petitioners, Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan and others, filed a habeas corpus petition before the Bombay High Court seeking release from detention unde...