Search Results for "Rule 17(c)"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Gadchiroli-Chimur Lok Sabha Constituency Dispute. Alleged Discrepancy of 62 Votes in Final Tally Does Not Constitute a Cause of Action Under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Dr. Rameshkumar Bapuraoji Gajbe, contested the election to the 17th Lok Sabha from the Gadchiroli-Chimur Constituency as a candidate o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Mehandi Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Sanction order found to be cyclostyled proforma without application of mind, rendering prosecution invalid.

The applicants, Chutararam and Jetharam Gehlot, were the proprietors of 'Prem Mehandi Center', a small manufacturer of henna/mehandi powder and cone p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements of Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Defect in Attestation of Affidavit and Failure to Serve Copy on Returned Candidate Renders Petition Void.

The present matter arises out of an election petition filed by Sulakshana Raju Dhar (the petitioner) challenging the election of Anna Dadu Bansode (Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Builder's Appeals in Execution Proceedings for Refund with Interest. State Commission's Calculation of Decretal Amount Upheld Under Section 73 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) disposed of two appeals, AE/21/2025 and AE/22/2025, filed under Section 73 of the Consumer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original petitioner Limo Cortez, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction Approval Due to Lack of Standing and Delay. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not owners of the suit property and approached the court after substantial delay.

The case involves a writ petition filed by legal heirs of the original petitioner, Mr. Limo Cortez, challenging the construction approval granted by t...