Search Results for "Rule 17(2) PAN Rules 2019"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court partly allowed Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld However order for imposition of cost set aside -- Petitioner Challenge to Conviction and Sentence Fails

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act -- The petitioner was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 17(2) of the PAN Rules, 2019 in GST Registration Cancellation Case. Rule requiring PAN Aadhaar linking for GST registration revival is intra vires the Finance Act, 2017 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Raju Laxman Pachhapure and Amit Pramod Minache, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit to branch.

The petitioner, M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...