Search Results for "Road Widening"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds BBMP Circular Requiring NOC for Building Plan Sanction on Sites Formed Prior to 1965. Circular dated 29.02.2016 held valid under Section 321 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and Article 300-A of Constitution of India.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging a circular dated 29.02.2016 issued by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies High Powered Committee Recommendations in Chardham Highway Project Case to Balance Development and Environmental Protection. The court held that widening of highways in ecologically sensitive Himalayan region must be subject to strict environmental safeguards and monitoring.

The case concerns the Chardham Mahamarg Vikas Pariyojna, a project by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to widen approximately 900 km of nat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Nagpur Improvement Trust Challenging High Court Order Setting Aside Demolition Notice. Internal Road Not Shown in Development Plan Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Implemented Despite Earlier Scheme Under NIT Act.

The case involves a dispute over a 15-metre internal road proposed under a Town Planning Scheme (the 'Abhyankar Road Widening and Buty Mahal Street Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Sakleshpur Town — Petitioners Failed to Show Any Infirmity in Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, owners of various properties on B.M. Road in Sakleshpur town, challenged the acquisition of their land for widening of the road. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Grant Under DCR Regulation 33(1) — Petitioner's Lack of Locus Standi and Failure to Establish Public Wrong Leads to Dismissal of Petition Seeking to Protect Mill Workers' Housing Rights.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, claiming to be a social activist and environmentalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay H...