Search Results for "Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013"

14 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Fresh Acquisition Under 2013 Act Where Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 1894 Act Deemed Lapsed as Award Not Declared and Possession Not Taken, Violating Article 300-A Right to Property.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, Roshan Shrikant Tandel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the acquisition proceedings concerning his land...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge as Infructuous Due to Laches and Non-Prosecution. Petitioners failed to file a note on the outcome of a pending Supreme Court decision for seven years, leading to dismissal of the writ petition.

10 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Punjaben Ramanbhai and others, filed a writ petition in 2018 before the Gujarat High Court challenging land acquisition proceedings c...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge for Non-Prosecution. Petitioners failed to file note on pending Constitution Bench decision on Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution.

10 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Mangalbhai Shanabhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Gujarat High Cour...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken, Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as Twin Conditions Must Be Satisfied.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside Due to Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation. Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings under the Land Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Acquisition Case — Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Award Passed After Five Years from Section 4 Notification Under Old Act.

15 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Sheetalkumar Sadashiv Zambare, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for his lands in Kolh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.

24 Nov 2015

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications Under Section 24 of 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid Under 1894 Act Precludes Lapse. Acquisition of land for a cooperative housing society upheld as possession was taken and compensation paid before the 2013 Act came into force.

24 Jun 2015

The petitioners, owners of land measuring 2 acres in Sy.No.7 and 1 acre in Sy.No.9 of Gubbalala village, Bangalore South Taluk, challenged the acquisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)