Search Results for "Retrospective"

1056 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1056 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Appeal Under Section 166(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166(5) Held Retrospective, Applies to Pending Appeals Where Claimant Died Before Amendment.

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2011 in MVC Nos.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment Extending Period for Acquisition of Reserved Land Under Section 127(1) of MRTP Act Applies to Notices Served Before Amendment — Landowner's Right to Deemed Lapse Not Affected Retrospectively.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arising from a writ petition concerning the interpretation of Section 127(1) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Charges in Distillery License — Levy Upheld as Contractual Obligation Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Modvat Credit Lapse Provisions in Finance Act, 1999. Retrospective Validation of Rules Causing Lapse of Accumulated Credit Upheld as Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, Coral Cosmetics Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered as a Small Scale Industry, was engaged in...