Search Results for "Restricted Goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Restricted Goods"

584 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 584 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.

3 Oct 2024

The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in GST Detention Case — Confiscation Notice Under Section 130 Without Prior Adjudication Under Section 129 Held Invalid. The court held that proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017 cannot be initiated without first completing the adjudication process under Section 129 of the Act.

25 Sep 2023

The Revenue (Union of India and others) filed an intra-court appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.100849/2022 dated 16.08.2022...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

7 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as agents of their members do not effect a 'sale' under sales tax laws.

3 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals considered the applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

28 Sep 2006

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

30 Nov -0001

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)