Search Results for "Regulation 1977 Rule 59(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Regulation 1977 Rule 59(3)"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Board's Refusal to Correct Marks Memo Pursuant to Education Officer's Order Under Clause 26.4 of Secondary School Code. Board Cannot Question Correction of School Record Made Under Education Officer's Order by Invoking Rule 59(3) of Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Regulations, 1977.

9 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Dhananjay Fulchand Khomane, a student, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Bench at Aurangabad) challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of News Broadcaster's Petition Challenging RBI Refusal to Accept Compounding Applications Under Foreign Exchange Management Act. The Court Examines the Compounding Process and the Validity of the 2017 Amendment to Rule 8(2) Barring Compounding When Section 37A Proceedings Are Contemplated.

26 Jun 2018

The petitioner, a public limited news broadcasting company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.

27 May 2022

The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.

21 Jun 2016

...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)