Search Results for "Regularization"

654 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 654 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularization of Services Due to Delay and Laches — Petitioner Superannuated Without Regularization Despite Resolution. Writ of Mandamus Denied as Relief Became Infructuous After Superannuation.

The petitioner, Vinodrai Gordhandas Agrawal, was appointed as a Sanitary Inspector by the Porbandar Nagar Palika on 21.04.1997 and superannuated on 31...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regularization of Ad-hoc Employees in Ambedkar Nagar Judgeship — One-Time Measure Under Umadevi Principles. Appellants appointed prior to 31.12.2001 and serving for over 10 years held entitled to regularization despite interim orders.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Rajnish Kumar Mishra and others, who were ad-hoc employees of the Ambedkar Nagar Judgeship in Uttar Pra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...