Search Results for "Registration Act 1908"

768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Decision in Property Title Dispute Due to Lack of Evidence on Power of Attorney. Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Restored as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Compliance with Registration Act for Foreign-Executed Document.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the original plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession over a property, all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Admission of Documents in Partition Suit — Secondary Evidence Permitted Under Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Documents Held Admissible as Certified Copies of Public Records or Where Plaintiff Failed to Produce Originals After Notice.

The suit was filed by Indira Rajguru against her brothers and sister for partition and declaration of rights in respect of properties. The matter came...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Family Property Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to 1/5th Share. Co-owner's Right to Partition Upheld Despite Unproven Allegations of Oral Partition and Will.

The suit was filed by Indira Rajguru, a resident of the United Kingdom, against her brothers and sister (defendants) for partition and separate posses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Admissibility of Documents in Suit for Partition and Declaration of Rights. Documents not proved in accordance with Indian Evidence Act, 1872 cannot be admitted in evidence unless original is produced or foundation for secondary evidence is laid.

The suit was placed before the court for considering the admissibility of documents referred to and relied upon by defendant nos.3 and 4 in their comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...