Search Results for "Reference to Larger Bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Reference to Larger Bench"

23 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

High Court

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

27 Mar 2026

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

5 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reference of Questions of Law to Larger Bench in Review Petition — Maintainability of Reference Affirmed. The Court held that its power to refer questions of law to a larger bench in a review petition is not barred by Order XLVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and can be exercised under Article 142 to do complete justice.

10 Feb 2020

The judgment arises from a reference made by a three-judge bench in review petitions against the Supreme Court's 2018 judgment in Indian Young Lawyers...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remits Reference in Central Excise Case — Original Challenge to Rule 5 Vires Unanswered. The Court held that the question referred to a larger Bench did not arise on facts and was not disputed by the assessee, and directed the Division Bench to decide the vires of Rule 5 under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Article 14 of the Constitution.

5 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court was hearing a reference arising from a Division Bench judgment in Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. v. Union of India. The original cha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Reference to Larger Bench in Pension Dispute of U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Employees. Preetam Singh Judgment Held Binding on State and Board Regarding Pension Scheme Implementation.

10 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court heard a batch of special leave petitions arising from writ petitions filed by employees of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parisha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Conflict Between High Courts on Settlement Commission Jurisdiction Under Customs Act — Personal Liberty and Right to Settle Disputes Under Chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the matter to be placed before the Chief Justice of India due to divergence of opinion between Bombay and Delhi High Courts on whether an accused can approach the Settlement Commission after arrest.

4 May 2023

The present writ petition was filed by Yamal Manojbhai, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, raising an issue o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Ex Gratia Payment Under Section 7(2)(xiv) of Maharashtra Mathadi Act Does Not Bar Workmen's Compensation Claim. The court interpreted Section 16 of the 1977 Act as not precluding a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, since ex gratia payment is not compensation under the 1923 Act.

19 Aug 2019

The case involves a reference by a Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court on the question whether an employee who has received ex gra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Question of Secretary's Appellate Jurisdiction Under MCS Act to Larger Bench. Rule 105 of MCS Rules 1961 cannot override statutory provisions of MCS Act 1960 regarding appellate authority.

29 Feb 2012

The judgment arises from four writ petitions (WP 1800/2012, 1801/2012, 1802/2012, 1803/2012) before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners include Sad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Question of Interpretation of Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. Property received by Hindu female in lieu of maintenance under a will creating life estate raises question whether it falls under Section 14(1) or 14(2).

9 Dec 2024

The present appeal arises from a suit for declaration and possession filed by the respondents (son and grandson of the testator) against the appellant...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)