Search Results for "Recruitment Rules 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Recruitment Rules 1976"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

8 Aug 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Administrative Resolution on Judicial Promotions Under Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules 2007. The Court Held That the High Court Could Prescribe Separate Minimum Marks in Written Test and Viva Voce Through Administrative Resolution Under Article 235 of the Constitution, as It Supplemented the Statutory Rules to Ensure Merit-Based Assessment.

13 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a batch of appeals challenging a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the appointment of thirteen in-service...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MPSC's Refusal to Recommend Candidates for Teacher Posts Due to Age Bar — MPSC's Discretion to Prescribe Age Limit Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

21 Sep 2023

The State of Maharashtra and its education authorities filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MP...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

15 Mar 2022

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization Process in Police Recruitment — Equi-Percentile Method Valid for Multi-Session Exams. Standardized Equi-Percentile Method for Normalization of Marks Across Different Sessions of Written Examination Held Permissible Under Uttar Pradesh Sub Inspector and Inspector (Police) Service Rules, 2015.

7 Jan 2022

The case pertains to the recruitment process for 2400 posts of Sub-Inspector of Police, 210 posts of Platoon Commander (PAC), and 97 posts of Fire Off...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

21 Jun 2016

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)