Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1651 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1651 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Criminal Appeals by Accused Against Conviction Under Sections 144, 148, 302 read with 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Appeals challenge conviction on grounds that trial court ignored material omissions and contradictions in eyewitness testimony regarding weapons, affecting common object.

29 Oct 2021

The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 24 November 1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1362 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Grampanchayat's Challenge to Land Acquisition Surrender Order Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Surplus Land Not Required for Rehabilitation Must Be Returned to Original Owner. The Court held that the Collector and Divisional Commissioner validly directed surrender of surplus land acquired for rehabilitation of project affected persons, as the public purpose ceased for the surplus land, and the Grampanchayat could not retain it.

10 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Grampanchayat Burambali, challenged orders dated 11th August 2003 and 23rd October 2003 passed by the Collector, Kolhapur, and the Div...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Creditor's Application for Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation; Cooperative Bank's Claim Based on Unregistered Mortgage and Recovery Certificate Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. A Recovery Certificate ordering attachment and sale does not create a charge on company assets without registration under Section 125 of the Companies Act, 1956, and an unregistered mortgage is void against the Official Liquidator.

3 Jun 2019

This matter arose in the winding up of Satwik Electric Controls Private Limited (the Company), ordered to be wound up on 19 July 2007. City Coop Credi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 395/397 IPC. The court held that the testimony of the injured witness, who identified the accused in court, was credible and did not require corroboration, and the recovery of stolen articles from the accused soon after the incident linked them to the crime.

5 Oct 2011

The case arises from a dacoity and murder that occurred on the night of 30th September 2005 at the house of the complainant, PW1, in Chandrapur. Five ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

24 Oct 2018

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Dacoity Case. Appeal Raises Questions on Identification of Accused and Seizure of Cash Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Arms Act, 1959.

8 Dec 2006

This criminal appeal arose from Sessions Case No. 26/2003 where the appellant (original accused No. 4) was convicted for dacoity under sections 395, 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, hears appeals challenging conviction for murder and related offences. Accused were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for causing death by unlawful assembly, while the victim appealed for enhancement of sentence and additional convictions.

16 Jul 2015

This judgment arises from three connected criminal appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Two Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Inconsistencies in Search and Seizure Procedure. Prosecution Failed to Prove Ownership of Searched Premises and Did Not Examine Material Witnesses, Rendering Conviction Unsustainable Under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

9 Feb 2005

This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the respondents under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The prosecution alleg...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

21 Nov 2017

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)