Search Results for "Real Estate Developers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Real Estate Developers"

381 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Builder in Consumer Dispute Over Double Allotment and Forfeiture. Purchase of Flat for Director's Personal Use Held Not Commercial, Affirming Consumer Status Under Section 2(7) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

9 Sep 2024

The respondent, Kushalraj Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., a real estate company, booked a flat in the appellant's project 'Omkar 1973 Worli' for the reside...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis.

26 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

22 Jan 2015

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of RERA Rules Requiring Registration of Ongoing Projects Without Prior Approvals. Rule 18(8) and Rule 31(9) of Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017 held intra vires the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

5 Mar 2021

The case involves three writ appeals filed by real estate developers (M/s. Panchmal Properties, M/s. Sri Nandana Builders, and another) against an ord...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against RERA Orders on Pre-2017 Agreements, Upholding Retrospective Application of MahaRERA. Court holds that Section 3(1) of RERA applies to ongoing projects even if agreements were executed before the Act came into force.

11 Sep 2020

The judgment concerns three connected second appeals filed before the Bombay High Court under the Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The appeals were filed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order — Restores Termination of Developer for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Consents and No-Objection Certificate. Failure to Obtain Consent of 70% Municipal Tenants and Annexure-II from MCGM Justifies Termination Under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slums Areas Act, 1971.

10 Jun 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) which had set aside the terminati...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Real Estate Dispute — RERA Bar Under Section 79 Applies to Civil Suits for Possession and Damages. The court held that a civil suit for possession and damages against a developer is barred by Section 79 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the dispute falls within the purview of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves a dispute between M/s H.M. Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. (formerly a partnership firm) and the H.M. Tamborine Apartments Owners Association a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Resident Welfare Association Against Developer for Non-Payment of Adequate Compensation Under DCR 33(7). MHADA Directed to Determine and Enforce Compensation for Temporary Alternate Accommodation as Per Notarized Agreements.

26 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Kagalwala Building Resident Welfare Association, representing residents of a building being redeveloped by respondent No.4 (Aaraaish D...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)