Search Results for "Rashness and Negligence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rashness and Negligence"

328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Criticizes Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's Dismissal of Compensation Claim for Death in KTC Bus Accident Due to Erroneous Application of Criminal Standard of Proof. Tribunal Failed to Compute Quantum Despite Framing Issue, Contravening Supreme Court Mandate to Decide All Issues and Apply Preponderance of Probabilities Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

19 Aug 2022

This appeal arose from the dismissal of a motor accident claim by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Margao. The appellant, a 62-year-old mentally ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Criticizes Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for Not Deciding Quantum and Following Outdated Precedents. Tribunal Dismissed Claim Petition on Negligence Grounds But Failed to Assess Compensation, Violating Duty to Decide All Issues Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 169(2).

5 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award dated 07.01.2021, which dismissed Claim Petition No.112/2017 filed by the appellant, a wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Medical Student in Rash Driving Case — Lack of Evidence of Negligence. FIR and Chargesheet under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 quashed as no prima facie case of rash or negligent driving established.

11 Jul 2011

The applicant, Dr. Nidhi Suresh Kharabe, a 26-year-old medical student, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accident was caused by the accused's rash or negligent driving.

28 Nov 2005

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Gajanan Majik, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 (rash driving) an...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

16 Apr 2014

The applicant, Tatyarao s/o Ganpatrao Tambe, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.8), Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.3625 of 2001 f...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Sep 2017

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Grievous Hurt in Road Accident — Evidence of Eye Witnesses and Spot Panchanama Sufficient to Prove Negligence.

26 Sep 2019

The applicant, Sumedh Shetye, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Valpoi for offences under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove High Speed or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

22 Dec 2006

The applicant, Madhukar Gaurishankar Swami, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, in Criminal Case No.482/1987 for offences unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 304(A) and 279 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Rash or Negligent Driving Causing Death.

3 Jul 2014

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Bashir Janubhai Pathan, who was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Pathardi, for o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the bus driver was driving rashly or negligently at the time of accident.

20 Dec 2018

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Deepak s/o Motiramji Bhoge, a driver employed with M.S.R.T.C., challenging his convictio...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)