Search Results for "Railway Claims"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Railway Claims"

563 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 563 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEB's Appeal and Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Goods Damage Claim — Railway Administration Held Liable for Negligence in Transit. Carrier's Duty of Care Under Section 72 of Railways Act, 1989 Requires Proof of Reasonable Care; Failure to Provide Open Wagon Cover or Proper Handling Constitutes Negligence.

8 May 2014

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a common judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, concerning damage to a consignment of elect...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitions Against Railway Eviction Notices -- Residents of Malad Fail to Prove Legal Right to Railway Land -- Eviction Upheld for Public Infrastructure Development

26 Feb 2026

The judgment involved 25 connected writ petitions filed by residents of Malad, Mumbai, against eviction notices from the Western Railway Administratio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Central Organisation for Railway Electrification Against Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Contract Dispute. Statutory Ineligibility Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act Prevents Serving and Retired Railway Officers from Acting as Arbitrators Despite Contractual Clause.

17 Dec 2019

The appellant, Central Organisation for Railway Electrification, awarded a work contract to the respondent, a joint venture company, on 20.09.2010. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. in Railway Short Delivery Case — Burden of Proof Under Section 65 of Railways Act, 1989 Not Discharged by Railway Administration. Shortage Receipt Issued at Delivery Station May Amount to Admission of Shortage, and Mere Remarks on Railway Receipt Do Not Prove Non-Supervision of Loading.

13 Feb 2014

The appellant, M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a government enterprise, booked a consignment of 27,020 litres of motor spirit at its siding ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

2 Aug 2017

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that pre-amended provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 apply to arbitration requests received before 23rd October, 2015, and the High Court must respect the agreed appointment procedure.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — Pre-Amendment Act Applies; No Claim Certificate Does Not Bar Arbitration; Mutually Agreed Procedure Must Be Respected

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that where requests for arbitration were made before the Amendment Act, 2015 came into force, the pre-amended provisions apply, and the High Court must respect the agreed procedure for appointment of arbitrator under Clause 64(3) of GCC.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that where parties have agreed on a procedure for appointment of arbitrator, the court must respect it unless bias or failure is shown.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)