Search Results for "Railway Catering"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounced Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Catering Policy Addendum. Petitioners Contended That Addendum Required Cabinet Approval, While Respondents Defended It as Within Competence and for Hygiene Improvement.

The South Western Railway Catering Contractors Association, a registered body of railway catering contractors, filed two writ petitions under Articles...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietory concern, participated in a tender issued by the Central Railway, Nagpur Division, for catering service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Auction of Unbooked Luggage Under Section 83 of Railways Act, 1989 — Auction of Unbooked Luggage Without Proper Notice and Valuation Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Sau. Nirmala w/o Vijaykumar Thakur, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the auction o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Board's Catering Licensing Policy — License Fee and Gross Sales Share Not Arbitrary. The policy requiring licensees to pay a share of gross sales is a valid contractual term and does not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, various catering associations and individual licensees, challenged the Railway Board's policy dated 1st April 2013 and subsequent cir...