Search Results for "RPF"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Oral Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that an oral partition during the lifetime of the father is valid and that the plaintiff failed to prove joint possession or title to the suit properties.

The plaintiff, Rajaraman, filed a suit for partition claiming 1/3rd share in two items of property allegedly belonging to his father Nadesa Vanniyar. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of RPF Constables for Unauthorized Absence — Holds Punishment Disproportionate. Long Unblemished Service of 17-18 Years Considered; Reinstatement Ordered Without Back Wages Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioners, Sadanand Mishra and Sitla Prasad Shukla, were former Constables in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) under the Union of India. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of RPF Constable for Dispensing with Enquiry Without Sufficient Reasons. Rule 53 of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Requires Recording of Reasons for Dispensing Enquiry.

The petitioner, an ex-Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was dismissed from service by order dated 15 January 2019, dispensing with the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Protection Force Dismissal Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority's Disagreement with Inquiry Officer Without Hearing Employee Invalidates Dismissal Under Railway Protection Force Act, 1957.

The respondent, Amar Bahadur Singh, was appointed as a 'Rakshak' in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of the Central Railway in 1960. On 15 April 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of RPF Constable for Dog's Bite Incident — Holds That Disciplinary Authority Cannot Impose Higher Punishment Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing to Delinquent Under Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968.

The petitioner, a constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) working as a dog handler of a dog named 'Rover', was subjected to disciplinary proce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Overcharging Decoy Passenger in Disciplinary Proceedings. Central Administrative Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority's Discretion Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Enquiry Report.

The case involves a disciplinary action against a railway employee, Moni Shankar, who was a Booking Supervisor. He was appointed as a Trains Clerk in ...