Search Results for "RERA jurisdiction"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Disputes Over Property Transaction Examining Jurisdiction, Admissions, and Legal Implications Under CPC and RERA

Disputes over a property transaction. It examines arguments made by both parties concerning jurisdiction, admissions, and the application of legal pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Challenging Admission of Section 7 Application by Allottees Against Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT order allowing impleadment of allottees and admitting the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as default was established.

The judgment pertains to two appeals filed against an order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Principal B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of RERA Rules Requiring Registration of Ongoing Projects Without Prior Approvals. Rule 18(8) and Rule 31(9) of Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017 held intra vires the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The case involves three writ appeals filed by real estate developers (M/s. Panchmal Properties, M/s. Sri Nandana Builders, and another) against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.

The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...