Search Results for "Project Affected Families"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Arogya Sevak from OBC and Project Affected Category. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for appointment from OBC and Project Affected Category in accordance with law.

The petitioner, Manisha Namdevrao Chole, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider her claim for appointment to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Providing Reservation for Earthquake Affected Persons in Government Employment. Mandal Commission Recommendations for Disaster Affected Persons Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the validity of a Government Resolution dated 17th November 1994 issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...